He was hauled away BEFORE he went before a judge. Geez, man. Do you argue just for the sake of argueing?
He was lucky that his lawyers got before a judge who follows the constitution.
Finally, if they ever come after me I’ll know whose side you’re on.
Everyone who is ever taken into custody is taken into custody first and put before a judge later. That's simple logistics.
Geez, man. Do you argue just for the sake of argueing?
I see. If I respond to you, I am simply arguing for argument's sake.
When you respond to me, however, you are arguing only for the greater good of all mankind.
Got it.
He was lucky that his lawyers got before a judge who follows the constitution.
In other words, if you agree with the judge he "follows the constitution" and if you disagree with him, then he does not. He is called a judge for a reason - to make a judgment on issues over which there is a legitimate dispute.
Finally, if they ever come after me I’ll know whose side you’re on.
I support the rule of law, not mob rule or emotionalism.
If you were ever arrested, I would insist on your receiving the same due process that I would expect for myself and that Raub was given.