I have a lawnmower that I'd love to loan them ... and I don't live all that far away!
Just suffocate him with bacon and get it over with.
Now get on with it - I'll bring the rope!
I have an old dull straight razor I’d loan them to dry shave him with.
He looks like the Colin Farrel character in “Horrible Bosses!”
I’d be willing to bet he has a padded allah rug, a koran and everything else a muzscum needs to bow to his child rapist moHamamadman.
Wasn’t he in the military when he committed the crime, and the crime was committed on a military base?
Isn’t this a military trial (and if not, why not)?
When you join the military you give up certain rights, like the right to wear a beard at your military trial for murder.
This is a military court, right? Seems like they wouldn’t be spooked by a beard.
Try the bearded basturd already and quit messin. If he is guilty, execute his bearded butt.
What the hail is the argument about? Be done with it already.
Since when did the length of a beard delay justice in the United States? More likely army investigators found some very inconvenient facts when searching this 35 year old unmarried man’s computer and apartment It simply will not do for our new gay friendly military to have an open trial before the election.
____
I worked for awhile at an old school redline brig in Norfolk, Va. We hand a few that were AWOL and running with the antiwar crowd that didn't feel like shaving, Big mistake, they were clean shaved when we got done. ;^).
Nah, a weedwhacker will do
Hooray!
Keep the blades dull. It will take multiple passes to get it scaled down to the skin.
Shave this POS convict him and stand him against a wall and fire..............
He “served” without a beard for a lot of years and made no demand to grow one. “F” him!
But why would our military carry weapons?
And why is cutting the soon to be dead man's beard even an issue? Why is he still breathing? That's the real issue.
Take care of that and the beard problem is solved.
I vote for the Weed Whacker. With a spool full of speedometer cable.
Introduce him to new blankets and clothes heavily populated with a thousand NITS!
Am I the only one who can’t understand Angela’s article? To paraphrase: Military attorneys say this and that and now that the judge has responded, the appeals court can make a decision. What does that mean? Responded to what? To the attorneys? Why would a judge respond to attorneys? Attorneys respond to judges. Can’t she just differentiate which judge of which court, responded to what, by saying what. If attroneys responded to something they did so on behalf of someone. Who? What? Why? When? Where? Come on, Angela.