Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Another Unappetizing Class Action Ruling from The Food Court
Forbes Magazine ^ | 08/09/12 | Glenn G. Lammi

Posted on 08/17/2012 9:32:49 AM PDT by AtlasStalled

A past Washington Legal Foundation Legal Pulse post commented on the class action litigation exploits of California consumer Skye Astiana and her efforts to save Americans from “unnatural” products. One of the cases in which Ms. Astiana is a lead plaintiff, Astiana v. Dreyer’s Grand Ice Cream, survived a motion to dismiss recently, a development which underscores the havoc such lawsuit-by-lawsuit regulation can wreak on food packaging and marketing. The judge who authored the Astiana ruling sits on the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, or as we’d like to call it, The Food Court.*

(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: foodnazis; foodpolice; skyeastiana; thefoodcourt

1 posted on 08/17/2012 9:32:53 AM PDT by AtlasStalled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled

I’ll bet she has no squawk about Ben & Jerry’s, though.


2 posted on 08/17/2012 9:45:22 AM PDT by beelzepug ("Blind obedience to arbitrary rules is a sign of mental illness")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beelzepug

Wonder if they ever got those carcinogenic levels of Dioxin (2,200 times greater than the level of dioxin allowed in wastewater discharged into San Francisco Bay from the nearby Tosco oil refinery) under control, in their ice cream?

http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2000/08/38302?currentPage=all


3 posted on 08/17/2012 9:59:52 AM PDT by Carriage Hill (Harry Reid [PERVERT-NV] has Vickie-the-goat in lingerie & stiletto heels, tied-up in his office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill
Interesting link to a story from the year 2000. Eight years later (July, 2008) there's thisApparently, Ben and Jerry's has not made much progress ... despite being quite progressive.
4 posted on 08/17/2012 10:21:22 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled
or as we’d like to call it, The Food Court.*

I get it.

5 posted on 08/17/2012 10:29:56 AM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven

They’re billionaires; they don’t give a crap. But 2,200x a measured, known sewage level of Dioxin, is *significant*. Where’s the FDA/EPA etc on that? Oh wait; they’re libs and 0bummer supporters, so they get a pass.


6 posted on 08/17/2012 10:32:07 AM PDT by Carriage Hill (Harry Reid [PERVERT-NV] has Vickie-the-goat in lingerie & stiletto heels, tied-up in his office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill
2,200x a measured, known sewage level of Dioxin, is *significant*.
I got my dioxin fix in VN via AO, but was only there 13 months.
Nice to know the looney-left have been getting their "fair share" for at least eight years ... and counting.
7 posted on 08/17/2012 10:42:06 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven

I never liked or ate B&J’s stuff. Starbuck’s Coffee was my addiction. Gave it and other certain foods up, and lost 85-lbs in 4-mos. It has (much less) Dioxin too, as do all commercial ice creams and their cardboard containers.


8 posted on 08/17/2012 11:46:35 AM PDT by Carriage Hill (Harry Reid [PERVERT-NV] has Vickie-the-goat in lingerie & stiletto heels, tied-up in his office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled

b...bu...but...but that labeling is on a product of interstate commerce; and the suit is pursuant to a state law. Doesn’t that Commerce Clause trump everything else, under Liberal dogma?


9 posted on 08/17/2012 7:36:01 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (Love me, love my guns!©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven
Nice to know the looney-left have been getting their "fair share" for at least eight years ... and counting.

And the twofer is that they pay through the nose to eat that crap.

10 posted on 08/17/2012 7:47:25 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (Love me, love my guns!©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ApplegateRanch

Federal courts regularly decide cases based upon the laws of the states. And since California has the broadest consumer protection laws, and since the Northern District is rather plaintiff friendly, that’s where the class actions get filed.


11 posted on 08/17/2012 7:56:16 PM PDT by Last of the Mohicans (Go Niners!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson