It’s in their freaking book.If they don’t believe their own freaking book why call themselves Islamic.
Not quite. The Sufi Islamists are a most reasonable sort, and once the others, Shi'a and Sunni alike who consider the Sufi to be superstitious rubes and heretical apostates are eliminated, there may indeed be a possibility of accord with those remaining Islamists.
There cannot be any compromise or agreement with Shariaists, however. Their doctrine is one of domination and conquest, and its head must be seperated from its body, then to be fed to pigs.
Meither are we Islamophobic, exhibiting an unreasoned fear or aversion of Islamists. Their behaviour through the XX Century and the first decade of the XXIst has been such that concern for criminal or murderous acts from them are quite reasonable, indeed. And anyway, real hatred or loathing for such would more accurately be Islamomisophia from the more correct Greek term. But it is bigoted Shariaists who we more specifically reserve our contempt, not all Islamists to include the Sufi.
Those who claim otherwise are either ignorant, or are propagandists for our sworn enemies.
I must be an ignorant propagandist then, because I don’t trust any of them.
The problem is Islam, including these peculiar divisions you erect. As has been said before, there may be peaceful Muslims but there is no peaceful Islam.
----
Send treats to the troops...
Great because you did it.
www.AnySoldier.com
(An entirely free service)