One more time: FR's God-given Life & Liberty constitutional conservative activism agenda!!

Aug 12, 2012 | Jim Robinson

[Christie at the beach]

Amen, Jim.

Very well said.

Thank you for having this forum. You cannot go to Yahoo or most of the news links posted at Drudge and have an opinion posted w/o the drive by bashers doing the planned hate tactics they do for their agenda. This forum gives us a firewall from the socialists and the haters.

[ImpBill]

Thank you for a well reasoned argument. You have many valid points. Earlier in the post you responed to I stated I have never and can easily predict I never will tell any citizen how and for whom their vote should be cast. Nor will I inquire after the election for whom they casted their vote. It is none of my business.

To be totally honest, I am not sure how or if I will vote fot the top of the ticket. I am not, nor have I been a Republican since 1998. Now that doesn't mean I haven't voted for Republican candidates. I loath John McCain and still can't get the stink off me from voting for him 4 years ago.

So, again, thanks for your reasoned post to me. God Bless you and yours and May God Bless America.

[Syncro]

Well of course my question was rhetorical.

But good answer, that makes sense!

[xzins]

Another $50 for a pro-God, pro-life, pro-everything-conservative website and patriot!

[going hot]

I think most here would agree that sending Obama packing and saving our country is our goal.

Well, the very next chance this country gets is this November.

If that is not successful, it will be 2016, if nothing changes in the system between now and then.

Unless, by some miracle, we get 67 senators in the senate to agree on conviction after house impeaches him, which is not going to happen in my life time.

Maybe some want him gone sooner, and others are waiting until 2016, when we have better choices.

Personally, I would not bet the farm, indeed the whole country as we know it, on 2016 suddenly showing us clear choices, with a acceptable conservative on the one side against what the dems will offer.

[Kickass Conservative]

Uh, my Post #61 was in Reply to NoGrayZone.

I have no idea what you're talking about.

Me thinks you are confusing me with someone else.

[GailA]

It was NO way to treat an elderly man who just was upset.

If all entitlements are to be abolished, then stop the government from taxing for them.

And then you have another entitlement to deal with it is called Military health care for those who did their 20+ years for sub par pay and were promised and granted it. TRICARE For LIFE. Are our under paid, over worked Military to be punished too?

If we were not GIVING FREE health care to ILLEGAL INVADERS, and allowing congress to dip into and not replace these funds they would not be in the shape they are currently in. Congress created this mess.

[betty boop]

Isn't that a bit contradictory? Would "a good man" align himself with an "abortionist/homosexualist statist"?

Perhaps only now are we seeing Paul Ryan's "true colors," which he has managed to conceal from us up to now. (Tongue-in-cheek there.)

Then again, here's another puzzlement: If Mitt Romney is "pro-abortion," then why did Planned Parenthood recently make a $1.2 media buy to air a political ad that lambasts Romney as a "pro-lifer" who would take away a woman's "right to choose?"

It does not compute.

[Alamo-Girl]

Interesting. I didn't know Planned Parenthood was already campaigning against Romney.

Thank you for your insights, dearest sister in Christ!

[daniel1212]

For God, Family, Country, Life and Liberty! But all according to how the first One defines it. Yet some people will ban you and will not eat at your “restaurant” (but they should rest their fowl rants)!

[Bruce Campbells Chin]

Thank you as well. The circular firing squads aren't helping anyone but the bad guys.

The scariest part of all this is the demographic trends, which favor Democrat interest-group politics. I'm not sure what the solution to that is long-term, other than getting a transformational candidate like Reagan who can really swing votes.

[Bruce Campbells Chin]

Thank you as well. The circular firing squads aren't helping anyone but the bad guys.

The scariest part of all this is the demographic trends, which favor Democrat interest-group politics. I'm not sure what the solution to that is long-term, other than getting a transformational candidate like Reagan who can really swing votes.

[CyberAnt]

Hi Jim,

Just discovered a terrible item in ObamaCare.

When a person reaches the age of 76 (I’ll get there in another year), they will NO LONGER BE ELIGIBLE FOR CANCER TREATMENT.

Isn’t that great ..?????? In other words, just take your pain pill and die!!! I guess the left has not figured out any other way to get rid of us .. yet!

[Jim Robinson]

That is the plan. The socialist government whether under Obama or Obama-lite Romney, plans to save medicare and social security and the nanny state "safety net" by killing off the older generation. That's the purpose of the death panels that you will find in any government health care plan. The only way to stop this nonsense is to go back to the constitution. Rip out all of this unconstitutional socialist nonsense and let the free market reign. Without government mandates and price controls, the price of healthcare and healthcare insurance will fall.

Obviously, the Marxist won't do that. But neither will Romney or the statist GOP-e. It's now all about saving medicare and social security and the minimum wage and nanny state safety net, etc. The GOP-e under Rove, Romney & Co. is now the savior of the New Deal and the Great Society.