Keith Olberman's nephew gets her butt handed to her.
1 posted on
08/12/2012 10:13:08 AM PDT by
hcmama
To: hcmama
“MSNBC’s supposed brightest commentator doesn’t do very well when there are folks on the set that disagree with her.”
I’ve come to the conclusion that Liberals do not prize wisdom and intelligence. For them, it’s all about personality and cleverness.
2 posted on
08/12/2012 10:17:37 AM PDT by
Psycho_Bunny
(OWS = The Great American Snivel War)
To: hcmama
Rachel Maddow argues like a girl - lots of eye rolling, smirks, attitude, and emotion but short on logic and facts.
3 posted on
08/12/2012 10:18:14 AM PDT by
GOPJ
(Freeper Neveronmywatch's convinced: Put a compass in the hands of a liberal it'll point south.)
To: hcmama
The GOPe nominated Romney because they don't really support Conservative values.
Romney chose a Conservative as VP, because he wants to appeal to the base.
The Democrats will now savage Romney/Ryan whenever Romney/Ryan says somethign Conservative.
The Democrats will now savage Romney/Ryan whenever Romney/Ryan says something that is not Conservative.
And the media will jump all over Romney/Ryan for their blatant hypocrisy.
It's 2008 all over.
5 posted on
08/12/2012 10:27:28 AM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(Roger Taney? Not a bad Chief Justice. John Roberts? A really awful Chief Justice.)
To: hcmama
Everytime I follow one of these newsbusters “X destroys Y” I am underwhelmed about 80% of the time.
Lowry could have done better in hammering the point of “Then why are all you Libs bashing Ryan?”
6 posted on
08/12/2012 10:30:21 AM PDT by
jb729
7 posted on
08/12/2012 10:34:30 AM PDT by
RandallFlagg
(Obama hates Mexicans (Fast and Furious))
To: hcmama
Did I miss something? Rich Lowery didn’t “destroy” anybody. If anything, Maddow looked like she won the argument just by her sheer smugness.
8 posted on
08/12/2012 10:40:19 AM PDT by
albie
To: hcmama
She’s a typical liberal; it doesn’t matter that she’s stupid. She’s got rudeness and most important, to them, she’s Gay. There is no way they’ll figure out what a fraud she is. Like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, helping the poor (i.e., the state) has been very, very good for her.
9 posted on
08/12/2012 10:44:13 AM PDT by
elhombrelibre
("I'd rather be ruled by the Tea Party than the Democratic Party." Norman Podhoretz)
To: hcmama
A.) Rachel Maddow?
B.) Harry Potter?
C.) Marshall Crenshaw?
D.) That one goofy kid, from "The Wonder Years"...?
11 posted on
08/12/2012 10:49:33 AM PDT by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
To: hcmama
Just watched it. Two babbling idiots talking over each other for 3 minutes is all I saw.
12 posted on
08/12/2012 10:53:55 AM PDT by
Reddon
To: hcmama
Ya know, the libs are always touting their people as the smartest, brightest, etc. Kinda’ makes you wonder if they really believe that, or maybe they know what we know (they’re not!).
14 posted on
08/12/2012 11:01:08 AM PDT by
jeffc
(The U.S. media are our enemy)
To: hcmama
Sorry, I can’t watch Madcow clips without projectile vomiting, or at least, violent dry heaves.
Madcow is the perfect Democrat spokesman. She is a flaming radical socialist atheist lesbian feminist propagandist. If she was also a disabled black Jew* on food stamps, she would be the entire Democrat base in one person.
* There are many cultural Jews who are atheists. Jews socially and by tradition but don’t believe in God, like George Soros is.
To: hcmama
DAN BALZ, WASHINGTON POST: Not only because of revenue, but he dissented because he did not think it went far enough on healthcare. . LOWRY: Right. And that's the key thing. Even President Obama, who's cut $700 billion from Medicare, which I guess you support
MADDOW: Which Paul Ryan will keep doing
LOWRY: Do you support $700 billion in cuts in Medicare over the next ten years? MADDOW: I'm not running for president. LOWRY: Do you? MADDOW: I'm not running for anything. Paul Ryan is running for vice president. LOWRY: Do you? Why cant you answer? See, you cant answer. MADDOW: But wait, I'm not running for anything.. LOWRY: This is the key vulnerability. Democrats have cut $700 billion out of Medicare which you won't or can't defend it. Defend it. MADDOW: Is it good or bad? LOWRY: Do you support it? You cant answer. MADDOW: But wait. Why are you asking me? So she is going to ask Ryan because he's "running for Vice President" but won't ask Obama the same question who is now President and is running again to be President another 4 years...because she herself is not a candidate? What?
To: hcmama
Kewl!
Lowry gets tough and slams Madcow.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson