There is no reason for the strike to be ineffective,
if it is massive enough to begin with.
Now is not the time for “surgical” strikes, the
infrastructure of the country must be destroyed
totally.
Bounce the RUBBLE!
Bounce it again!
Keep on bouncing it.
Let them try to build a bomb by candle light.
A “strike” is underway and has been underway since before Bush left office. Stuxnet and most likely the assassination campaign and the Iranian “revolution” are, I’m convinced, all initiated by Bush. Timing-wise, he’s got to be the match that lit the fuse.
But the “strike” where you go in and bounce rubble, that won’t happen; at least not against the nuclear targets. The nuclear targets each have too little value to justify the level of investment and risk required to take them out. The targets where you invest a direct “bounce the rubble” delivery risk have to be more highly leveraged to be of value in stopping the program. Meaning, if you expend a bomb from a US plane then that bomb would “directly” effect whether Iran could build a bomb. The program is too spread out for that unless Obama is willing to kill Iranians on a World War II scale.
Given what’s going on in Iran and Syria a direct bombing campaign would adversely effect everything else in
America’s interest. Therefore, it is best to continue with the level of conflict that’s going on now. It will be the price of bread in Tehran that destroys the regime and therefore the nuclear weapon program.
Besides, “bouncing the rubble” would be SOOOO George Bush. /s