...but the Congress may grant the preside3nt the power to do so- meaning, as I understand it, that it’s an incident issued vesting- not a once for all vesting- meanign everytime the president wants ot appoint he must call on congress to allow him to do so without their confirmation being needed-
Unless I’m misunderstanding hte issue- I don’;t beleive congress granted him that privilege this time- and he just took it on himself to ignore trheir right to be the oens to allow him to do so
but the Congress may by law vest the appointment of such inferior officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the courts of law, or in the heads of departments.
Again, simply because congress may have vested another president to do so in the past doesn’t give present presidents the same vested right to do so now- unless there was an amendment established io nthe consitution allowing all future presidents to appouint without cionfirmation by goncress