says party leaders should have researched Mark Clayton and kept him off the ballot.
“Mr. Forrester did not do his duty to screen this democratic candidate,” Larry Crim said.
///
so for the crime of being pro-life, he should have been researched and disqualified?
...yet they approved Obama, without even checking his long form... when his own author bio at the time, claimed he was born in Kenya ? Connecticutt S.S.N. ? ... 2 digit stamp on his selective service form instead of 4 ?
How can they keep him off? In TN all you have to do is get the signatures and file. The parties don’t control that.
I’ve emailed Channel 5 talking heads a couple of times already about their continuous “he belongs to a hate group” dialogue. I’m waiting for a response to my question, “What’s hateful about respect for all life?” Still hearing crickets.
I’ve considered emailing the Dem Party but I really don’t want a bunch of their junk filling my inbox forever afterwards.
The TN Dems going to regret going this route. Already, the questions about the lack of vetting Obamarx are cropping up and at some point, they’re going to have to answer to that.