Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bitsy

I agree....Mitt doesn’t need to be dragged into every left wing made up controversy and get off message....who knows, maybe this one was just for that purpose?


8 posted on 08/07/2012 6:58:24 AM PDT by georgia peach (georgia peach)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: georgia peach

IMHO this clearly went beyond what the left had planned, and was (rapidly) backed off of.

Chick-fil-A won this one, big.

Next...


11 posted on 08/07/2012 7:02:25 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (America doesn't need any new laws. America needs freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: georgia peach
Well, now we know what we always suspected ~ Romney has no idea what free speech is about.

Dump him now before he strikes again.

12 posted on 08/07/2012 7:02:25 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: georgia peach; Bitsy

Trap or not, the dems clearly underestimated the response to this one. Mitt had a chance to knock it out of the park. In one fell swoop, he’d have stood on the side of free speech and the sanctity of the first amendment while intimating (if he’s incapable of shouting) support for traditional marriage, AND proving that there MIGHT be connection (however frail) between himself and flyover country. Instead he’s “playing it safe,” running in place somewhere between home and first waiting to be tagged.

HUGE mistake. Campaign staff needs to be replaced.


41 posted on 08/07/2012 7:43:48 AM PDT by Mach9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: georgia peach
Mitt doesn’t need to be dragged into every left wing made up controversy and get off message.

Heaven forbid that Mitt should ever be asked to clearly, and unequivocally stand up for conservative values - even when he's got hurricane force winds at his back.

Speaking of 'message'. What is his message? Does he even have one, or is he just running on the 'I'm not Obama' platform?

53 posted on 08/07/2012 8:29:15 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: georgia peach

We are not clueless and neither is Levin entirely. If the First Ammendment right to speech is above your head and nothing but a side issue to you and to Romney, one that he must duck and not be “dragged into”, willing to be seen defending with his life, his liberty and his sacred honor, then I fully understand why we have a socialist/Marxist at the top of a Republican ticket. The galactically stupid not only demand nothing, stand for nothing, but will cheerfully tolerate anything in the name of fear. We are all Europe now.

Peace and safety at any price will assure you of neither. And SOON.


63 posted on 08/07/2012 9:04:21 AM PDT by RitaOK (NO ROMNEY, NO COMPROMISE. NO WAY. NO HOW. NOT NOW. NOT EVER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: georgia peach
I agree....Mitt doesn’t need to be dragged into every left wing made up controversy and get off message....who knows, maybe this one was just for that purpose?

That's just what this is and, fortunately, Romney's a bit smarter than to get dragged in this time. Expect more of these in the coming days, weeks, months.

68 posted on 08/07/2012 9:22:29 AM PDT by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson