Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EU punishes overfishing with deeper quota cuts
EurActiv ^ | 02 August 2012 | (EurActiv.com with Reuters)

Posted on 08/02/2012 2:49:48 PM PDT by Olog-hai

EU member states that have repeatedly flouted EU limits on how much fish they can catch will receive greatly reduced quotas for this year, as the bloc strives to ensure sustainable fishing, the European Commission said on Wednesday (1 August).

Those who incur the biggest penalties are France, Portugal and Spain.

Quotas are normally reduced by a percentage of the amount a nation has overfished. …

Quotas have been a regular source of contention among major fishing nations such as Spain, Denmark, France and Britain. …

(Excerpt) Read more at euractiv.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: europeanunion; eussr; fishing; quotas

1 posted on 08/02/2012 2:49:53 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

So they didn’t pay attention to the quota’s the first time, so you made the quota’s smaller. Well done. Next time give them the comfy chair.


2 posted on 08/02/2012 2:52:41 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

There are two ways to address shortages: rationing, and making more of whatever it is that is in shortage.

Leftists prefer rationing, because it gives them more control over people. However, it does not help the shortage. But the leftists don’t care about the shortage, or solving it. They want the control.

In this case, the way to solve the shortages would be to require those fishing nations to restock with a large multiple of replacements of the kind of fish they are fishing, according to set rules and under inspection to insure they are doing it right.

The assumption is always that attrition of the replacement fish is going to be very high, so it has to be overcome with great abundance.

Importantly, replacement hatchery fish must be within “third generation wild”, and planned with the assumption that they will be strong and healthy, yet cross breed with wild fish to produce good quality offspring, with considerable genetic diversity.

A well carried out program like this would result in a huge abundance of wild fish, so fish catches would be better and more people can eat fish.

Similar schemes have been very effective with land animals, and even insects and plants. But leftists don’t like them.


3 posted on 08/02/2012 5:09:46 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson