[Tau Food]

I'm not saying you should vote for Tom Hoefling. I'm saying that I am proudly voting for Tom Hoefling. And, I'm saying that if you have reservations about who you are planning to vote for, then maybe you should check out Tom's campaign website.

On the other hand, if you already have a favorite candidate and you like him, you vote for him and you be proud of the fact you're voting for him.

[mnehring]

How can you ‘proudly vote for him’ when so far, he hasn’t been able to answer if he has qualified to be on a single ballot.

That is the most basic of hurdles to show you have the competency to run even the smallest campaign, like school board.

[skeeter]

That sounds noble, but doesn't explain why you show up on these threads trashing the only other realistic alternative to Obama.

I'd have more respect for you if you simply admitted you think Obama would be a better alternative to Romney, as some of the more honest anti-Romney FReepers do.

[arasina]

I'm not saying you should vote for Tom Hoefling. I'm saying that I am proudly voting for Tom Hoefling.

And I'm saying that a vote for a candidate like Tom who has virtually no chance of being elected POTUS in 2012 is not something for which you should be proud. It's an exercise in futility and a proxy vote for Obama.