Exposing the Company that Profits from Incinerating the Remains of Murdered Children

Christian NewsWire ^ | July 23, 2012 | Staff

[Tau Food]

I hope that, once Romney loses, you’ll be able to find common ground with conservatives again. We’re going to need you after November. ;-)

[BlackElk]

As I posted previously, you post what you please. So will I. If you don't care for me pointing out the obviously pro-abort nature of your candidate, if I got in the way of the myth making, tooooo bad!. If you imagine me rude, I have been called far worse and have no regrets.

If I were you and thank God I am not, I would be far more embarrassed to be the Mittler pom pom girl that you are.

As an attorney, I represented 1100 pro-life arrestees (30 were convicted of anything). They flooded into the abortion mills, shut them down, poured raw eggs (to facilitate uncontrolled bacteria growth) into the suction machines and generally put any invaded mill out of business for weeks while the killing machines were rebuilt. Sometimes, the cops would tear the mill apart literally to get at the Rescuers.

Meanwhile, in other news, Mittler was giving personal donations to Planned Barrenhood and including them and abortion on demand in Romneycare. If, as one might suspect, you are a Romney pom pom girl, then, yes, you are a pro-abort whether you care to admit it to yourself or not.

Also, on "incredibly rude," I guess that means the airheads at the Junior League and at the polo club would disapprove of me. Where I come from, that is a complement. Rude and damn proud of it!!! If that makes me a troll, so be it. I am Spartacus!

AND, I bet I have posted here a LOT more than you have and never yet genuflected before a lifelong baby killer like Mittler.

BTW, I note that you have yet to address a substantive issue AND that you imagine yourself in charge of what others post. I also thought you had run over yonder hill with your tail between your legs.

[DManA]

I made several posts on the topic the thread until it was taken over by hijackers. I keep to the thread topic out of respect for the integrity of Free Republic and out of respect for posters who want to express opinions on the top of the tread and not what thread bullies want to discuss instead.

My position on Romney is nothing like the one you have invented for me out of nothing but animus and embarrassment over having to be lectured on the subject of thread curtsy. I have posted hundreds of times on the topic of Romney on threads devoted to that subject. Feel free to search for me in the Forum and apologize of you see fit.

[DManA]

Let me try that again and fix some typos:

I made several posts on the topic of the thread until it was taken over by hijackers. I keep to the thread topic out of respect for the integrity of Free Republic and out of respect for posters who want to express opinions on the topic of the tread and not what thread bullies want to discuss instead.

My position on Romney is nothing like the one you have invented for me out of nothing but animus and embarrassment over having to be lectured on the subject of thread courtesy. I have posted hundreds of times on the topic of Romney on threads devoted to that subject. Feel free to search for me in the Forum and apologize if you see fit.

[smoothsailing]

The SEC documents don’t lie. Romney’s name is the only one there. It’s his signature. If this wasn’t true, Corn and Co. wouldn’t have had a story, now would they. It’s sad that we had to get the facts of the matter from the Left, because Romney Republicans on the “Right” have no interest whatsoever in what is true about Romney at this point.

Yes, well Factcheck.org (no fan of Mittens) has chimed in on the matter as well....

"None of the SEC filings show that Romney was anything but a passive, absentee owner during that time, as both Romney and Bain have long said. It should not surprise anyone that Romney retained certain titles while he was working out the final disposition of his ownership, for example." ....

"We would reassess our judgment should somebody come up with evidence that Romney took part in specific management decisions or had any active role (not just a title) at Bain after he left to head the Olympics. But nothing we’ve seen directly contradicts Romney’s statements — which he has certified as true under pain of federal prosecution — that he “has not had any active role” with Bain or “been involved in the operations” of Bain since then."

http://factcheck.org/2012/07/romneys-bain-years-new-evidence-same-conclusion/

I could be wrong, EV, but throwing in with David Corn and Mother Jones just doesn't strike me as a sound career move for any pro-lifer.

[EternalVigilance]

I have no doubt that this man who spent his entire adult life actively pushing child murder, and whose default position to this day is in support of judicial supremacy and therefore abortion on demand, profited substantially from Stericycle’s gruesome trade.

What else does any person of conscience need to know?

And it has nothing to do with David Corn.

[EternalVigilance]

I could be wrong, EV, but throwing in with David Corn and Mother Jones just doesn't strike me as a sound career move for any pro-lifer.

In the first place I have never "thrown in" with David Corn or Mother Jones. That's a gross misrepresentation on your part.

Secondly, I seriously doubt that "throwing in" with Mitt Romney is going to burnish the credentials of Republican "pro-lifers."

[smoothsailing]

In the first place I have never "thrown in" with David Corn or Mother Jones. That's a gross misrepresentation on your part.

I don't see it that way.

There's of course this:http://www.selfgovernment.us/10/post/2012/07/stericycle-willard-mitt-romney-used-to-be-an-abortion-profiteer.html

this: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2905271/posts

this: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2905271/posts?page=22#22

I was particularly struck by this one since it appears to border on self-deception and that would be sad: LifeNews is a mouthpiece for Romney. David Corn is more honest. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2905271/posts?page=64#64

Those are just a few of many examples of your recent affectation with the likes of Corn, Lawrence O'Donnell, Mother Jones, and MSNBC. It's abundantly clear you've embraced their fevered assumptions and are now shouting them from any rooftop you can find.

Personally I can't stand Romney, and have no intention of supporting him or voting for him. I'll be concentrating my efforts on down ticket races this Fall.

While I certainly support your pro-life position, your embrace of the meme put forth by the above named leftist scum is truly disappointing.

It may well be that Romney is guilty of everything you and they claim. I must say it wouldn't surprise me at all, he's not at all trustworthy and over the years has spoken out of both sides of his mouth. But it's as yet unproven and has been repeatedly debunked by both conservative and liberal sources , and there lies the problem.

I contend it would be prudent to not embrace the agenda driven assumptions of the enemies of life and conservatism. Better to seek the facts, and embrace the truth when it reveals itself.

FRegards.

[EternalVigilance]

It hasn’t been debunked at all. Folks like yourself, out of political expediency, simply refuse to face up to what the SEC documents clearly show: It was Mitt Romney who signed on the dotted line for Stericycle and no one else.

[smoothsailing]

We’re done, EV. You can continue to throw out false assumptions about me or anyone else you want, and talk in circles to your heart’s content, but this conversation is over.

Good Day.

[EternalVigilance]

Should we assume that you’ve “thrown in” with “FactCheck”?

[EternalVigilance]

Good luck defending the pro-choice democrat GOP nominee. You’ve got your work cut out for you.

[smoothsailing]

Good luck defending the pro-choice democrat GOP nominee. You’ve got your work cut out for you.

Such an asinine accusation deserves no response, and you only diminish yourself in making it.

Enough.

[EternalVigilance]

What other reason could there be for you spinning Romney's proven ownership of Stericycle?

---

A later SEC filing that references the November 1999 Schedule 13D.

[Excerpts:]

NOTICE & PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A

STERICYCLE, INC.

NOTICE OF 2001 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON MAY 15, 2001

PROXY STATEMENT

STOCK OWNERSHIP

Bain Entities(3),(4)   2,218,724   11.25 %
c/o Bain Capital, Inc.
Two Copley Place
Boston, Massachusetts 02116 

A Schedule 13D, dated November 22, 1999, jointly filed by the Bain Entities and the MDP Entities reported that each of the Bain Entities has sole voting and sole dispositive power with respect to its shares.

The Schedule 13D also reported that (1) other entities related to Bain Capital, Inc., in their roles as general partners of the Bain Entities, may be deemed to control some of the Bain Entities and thus share voting and dispositive power with respect to their shares, and that (2) W. Mitt Romney, an individual, may be deemed to share voting and dispositive power with respect to 2,116,588 shares of common stock in his capacity as the sole shareholder of Bain Capital, Inc. and of other entities that serve as general partners of the Bain Entities.  

Read SEC filing ... 

 

[BlackElk]

Animus probably. Embarrassment??? NEVER! No one appointed you to be the thread police. No one likely will. No one is stopping you from posting whatever you imagine relevant. You get to control your speech but no one else's. Also take your "lecture" and put it where the sun shineth not. I react to what you post here and I am not going on a search for whatever you have posted elsewhere. I don't regard you as sufficiently important to go to such lengths. IF you do not express yourself clearly on a thread, that imposes no obligations on others responding. Feel free to prove your bona fides by bashing Romney if that is what you now CLAIM to be your position on Mittler. Or not, as you see fit.

BTW, for someone whining as the self-appointed thread police over the posts of others being somehow a problem for not genuflecting to defenses of Mittler, you sure are prolonging your own self-expressed agony by doing precisely what you complain against.

[BlackElk]

smoothsailing:

Which part of Eternal Vigilance's description of Mittler "pro-choice democrat GOP nominee" do you find asinine and why? Facts and proof in addition to any mere editorials.

[smoothsailing]

It’s not the description, BE, it’s the accusation. Read it again.

[DManA]

So the game is to just repeat yourself?

Ok, here ya go. read this again:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2909630/posts?page=63#63

[BlackElk]

You are making the obvious mistake of imagining that I give a rat’s patoot for what you claim to think about what you hallucinate to be internet etiquette. The “game” is to resist anything that appears to be pimping Romney. You claim NOT to be pimping Romney. That and not your opinions is all that matters. Dry up and blow away. You have precious little on whatever passes for your mind.

[DManA]

Ditto.