Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Meet the New Boss
No, I think it must go to the place of birth. That's the only thing Obama and the MSM could not explain away and therefore would justify going to the lengths and taking the risks that he has taken on this.

Also, from what I gathered from the news conference it sounded like anybody could get a Hawaiian birth certificate even if born from outside the country. All that would be required would be for the parents to be residents of the State of Hawaii.

If this is the case it's possible that there was a birth certificate. If there was, why would he not just release that (even though he may have been born outside of the US - seems like it would not necessarily reflect that on the birth certificate).

Or, perhaps there is no birth certificate. At least not from Hawaii.

22 posted on 07/18/2012 1:37:41 AM PDT by tsowellfan (http://www.cafenetamerica.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: tsowellfan

The explanation that best fits the facts to my mind is that Grandma Toot tried to file something with the Hawaii DoH in August 1961.

This filing is what triggered the newspaper birth announcements.

But the birth claim that Grandma Toot filed was a half-handwritten, half-typed dodgy paper that if anyone actually looked at, would raise more questions than it answered.

So Obama’s solution was to come up with a birth certificate that looked like a normal document someone born in a hospital would have, and so hopefully questions wouldn’t be raised as to whether he was really born in Hawaii.


25 posted on 07/18/2012 1:48:04 AM PDT by Meet the New Boss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson