Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kartographer; All

Meh. Doom porn. Unless there is some dynamic in the direction/ duration/ whatever of this flare that will make it especially destructive, it isn’t so much compared to the flares of 2003- 04

Go here & scroll down to A Record Breaking X- Class Solar Flare, 05 Nov 2003.

http://spacew.com/astroalert.html

That one was literally off the charts & had to be estimated (extrapolated) because GOES could only measure up to an X17.4. It was estimated to be between X30 & X40.
(The Astro Alerts page only goes back to 2002, but 2002 through 2005 were really active)

(I don’t mean this post to be dismissive- just that we’ve been there & done that & we’re still here to tell about it. Maybe I was all caught up in the prospect of getting to see the aurora, but I don’t recall any problems with our computers, car radios, or cell phones. Obviously, anything in the upper atmosphere is going to be affected)


13 posted on 07/12/2012 10:14:17 PM PDT by KGeorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: KGeorge

If you go back to 1859,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_storm_of_1859

THIS one would probably hurt if it happened in our technological world today. Fortunately, records in Antarctic ice show that it might have been a 1-3 in 1000 year event. Meaning, it might happen in a few hours, or not for at least several hundred years.


16 posted on 07/12/2012 11:14:01 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson