What part of ‘free EXERCISE of religion’ do they not understand?
That's what I'm wondering. I also notice practically everyone here has their ideas about what this guy should or should not do, should or shouldn't have done. Why? Who put them (or anyone else) in charge?? Why are you passing judgement on the size of the guy's building - or his family - or what he does on his own property? Maybe we should ask what part of LIBERTY they don't understand. I'm getting real worried, as people in here sound more and more like the statists out there.
----------------
Doughty One, your posts on this are so good.