Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RobbyS
The difference is that Massachusetts has the legitimate authority to do such a thing. Congress does not: yet, the Chief Justice has just said they do.

So socialism at the State Level is OK, but not at the Federal level.

What a concept for a conservative to argue for.
28 posted on 07/09/2012 9:24:16 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: SoConPubbie

Well, it may be bad policy and still be law. That is why Scalia mentioned slavery in connection with the Arizona case. It may have been bad policy, but even Lincoln acknowledged that a state had a right to institute it.


30 posted on 07/09/2012 9:33:29 PM PDT by RobbyS (Christus rex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie
"So socialism at the State Level is OK, but not at the Federal level. What a concept for a conservative to argue for."

Speaking the truth is not the same as arguing for it. A state can do anything allowed in its state constitution. It's the federal government that is limited by the US constitution. That's simply a fact.

35 posted on 07/10/2012 4:54:54 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Galileo: In science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson