Mark my words, Mark ‘em!!! The doomsayers are not only tiresome, they are irrational.
Romney by 3 to 7 points in the popular vote ... or more, not less.
North of 290 electoral, likely to be revised up.
I would also prefer Newt or Sarah or many others, but the reality is they are unelectable precisely because they are better than Romney. Palin and Newt are too much for the undecided’s. The undecided’s are the reason it’s not going to be a chad festival. Also, much as I love them both, and may marry them when the next iteration of marry-whomever-you-want is ratified (OK not Newt,) neither is qualified to lead this particular economy.
It is correct that Rasmussen is most accurate both historically and methodologically. And he also knows Romney will win. Mark those words.
if romney wins by 3 or more...he will get more than 290..3 or more means most likely pa,wi,mn,or,mi...one or more of them will fall to us
I love your optimism. It is refreshing amidst all the negativity on this website. But, I am curious what makes you say that Rasmussen is “accurate both historically and methodologically.” I understand his 2010 model, but I worry that he is over-sampling Republicans. No?