Romney had little or nothing to do with the Left’s attacks on Palin.
Nor did he “destroy” the GOP in Mass.
I’m sure you would be taking whacks at Reagan for not being “conservative” enough, too. So there isn’t much coming from you that is true.
There is a difference in a RINO “attack” and people having less enthusiasm for Sarah than I have. Obviously Romney had no control over McCain’s campaign. Most of that claim is just silly crap.
90% of the GOP is “RINO” to you, I am sure. There are few, if any, politicians acceptable to you.
The only one taking whacks at Reagan is Romney and his deluded supporters. They go around lying and saying Reagan was pro-choice like Romney. These deceitful RINOs say Reagan did X and Reagan did Z. So you must consider him a RINO too.
Unfortunately, Ronald Reagan is no longer here to clean Romney’s clock. Romney has always hated Reagan from as far back as when Romney’s father ran for president. All the “Rockefeller republicans” just like Romney hated Reagan. He has absolutely no problem with lying about Reagan. The fact that you seem not to know or even care about this is no surprise. That you think I would imagine Reagan as a RINO is laughable though.
The RINOs are RINOs to me. Romney barely passes as a RINO because he is one of the full out socialists Reagan warned us about. Anyone who could dream up and initiate socialized medicine and claim it is the conservative answer to healthcare, needs serious examination because he is a stealth socialist. Romney, the father of socialized medicine in the US has already proven he is a socialist by his acts and by his history.
Politics and politicians by nature are not very acceptable. But there are some who do more than constantly think about what is in it for them. But your chosen socialist, Mitt, is not one of those good ones.