Basically what gay, lesbian and whatever else that acronym stands for are demanding is a moral sanction for their lifestyle. Does the driver not have any rights? If a gay person found out he was driving the float for a anti gay group wouldn’t it then be unacceptable for he she or it to refuse? You people have the right to live your life any way you want but don’t demand that I sanction it. It’s not yours to demand and you will never have it.
Note that the acronym and “pride” festivals are exclusive of “breeders”.
Rather than a “tolerance” event, it’s a “look at me” series of orgies and excess.
I won’t celebrate their sins.
No, actually he doesn't. This is the real problem with all of these "special rights" that they give to these protected groups. In the end, it is all other citizens who have their actual constitutional rights taken away. I first began noticing this phenomenon when Mass. started giving children to these people thru adoption. Because the Catholic Church would not do that, they had to stop doing adoptions. So, a Catholic couple who might seek an adoptive child from their church can no longer do so; a pregnant woman who wishes to give her child up for adoption; but, wants the child to have the best home available, which to her, is a mother/father married, can no longer have the confidence that her child won't end up with two men or two women with suspect lifestyles.
A "gay" couple could go to secular agencies that would participate is this questionable practice of giving innocent children to these couples; but, no, NO ONE should be allowed to say no to them. They cannot have anyone with a different viewpoint, allowed to participate in society.