Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grundle

Congress already said the bill was too complicated to be read and would require the assistance of two lawyers and THAT’S from a Democrat who voted for it and mocked those who’d ask if he actually read it.

The purpose is to bloat it with red tape and loopholes so that anyone approaching it would become lost down the rabbithole trying to interpret it. Even another challenge to the Supreme Court would fall flat since they didn’t bother to read it and decided the case on “outcomes” not Constitution.

All or nothing, either put Congress under this monstrosity or junk it. Muslims too. Illegals, no.


16 posted on 07/05/2012 8:56:57 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Fools.Damn fools.Welcome to the USSA. Socialism is slavery to the State and the Supreme Court did it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: a fool in paradise
Congress already said the bill was too complicated to be read and would require the assistance of two lawyers and THAT’S from a Democrat who voted for it and mocked those who’d ask if he actually read it.

That was John Conyers.
17 posted on 07/05/2012 9:00:24 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson