Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BarnacleCenturion

Yes, I heard that at the time. He wouldn’t say that ObamaCare violated the Constitution, but would agree that it was bad policy.

That (of course) was the predesigned pubbie talking point. It was everywhere.

Then we got the meatheads that were trying to sell the crapola that John Roberts was a genius chess player and all of us were imbecils.

Then we got harumph and garumph and let’s turn back to the economy.

It’s not like we don’t follow this stuff, BC.

NOW, Romney is able to say that it’s “not based on the Constitution.”


49 posted on 07/04/2012 6:34:43 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: xzins
Yes, I heard that at the time. He wouldn’t say that ObamaCare violated the Constitution, but would agree that it was bad policy.

NOW, Romney is able to say that it’s “not based on the Constitution.”

Yes Mitt immediately came out and said that Obamacare was bad policy and that he would repeal it...and yes it wasn't until 4 or 5 days later that he said it was unconstitutional (which is really the primary point).

Meanwhile, Obama continues to be for it.

137 posted on 07/05/2012 9:38:20 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson