To: sickoflibs
“Romney replies that states like MA can impose a fine without calling it a tax to make it constitutional but at the Federal level it must be called a tax.”
Is this accurate?
102 posted on
07/05/2012 7:21:58 AM PDT by
GOPsterinMA
(The Glove don't fit.)
To: GOPsterinMA
To: GOPsterinMA
RE :
Romney replies that states like MA can impose a fine without calling it a tax to make it constitutional but at the Federal level it must be called a tax.
......
Is this accurate?”
Please be more specific with your question so I don't go off on a tangent.
107 posted on
07/05/2012 7:29:30 AM PDT by
sickoflibs
(ABBBO chant: "We must support Romney because he doesn't matter." (Obam-ney Care is bad now ))
To: GOPsterinMA
States can impose whatever is allowed by its constitution as long it doesn’t involve a right resevered by the US Constitution to the federal govt.
108 posted on
07/05/2012 7:29:47 AM PDT by
Perdogg
To: GOPsterinMA
Is this accurate?
It's a sloppy way of saying that the 10th Amendment allows states to do things the feds can't. The feds can (according to SCOTUS) do the mandate only through its taxing authority. Depending on the state constitutions, the states may not be limited to doing this under their taxing power.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson