Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I'd be careful not to stir up Obama's base, in these battleground states, or at least wait to commit until after the November Election..

I believe the administration would welcome the controversy to help get his people motivated to vote this cycle..

1 posted on 06/30/2012 11:11:19 PM PDT by carlo3b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: carlo3b

I disagree. If the Republicans appear to be cowering the conservative base will stay home.

Instead of trying to be cute about it they should just do the right thing.


2 posted on 06/30/2012 11:50:53 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (I miss Harriet Miers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: carlo3b

Frankly baring a disastrously wast-full federal spending requirements(which are sometimes the case) this is of little long term significance. The problem is Our people will be forced by lawless(boundless) washington to finance the socialist services of other states. That fact alone will tend to force compliance.


5 posted on 07/01/2012 1:28:19 AM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: carlo3b

Red states will mostly opt out.

Blue states will tax you and penalize you for acts of resistance.

Pretty soon all blue adjoining states will have fences to keep the people leaving like the Berlin Wall.


7 posted on 07/01/2012 2:52:56 AM PDT by Eye of Unk (Is your state Obamacare free yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: carlo3b
I'd be careful not to stir up Obama's base, in these battleground states, or at least wait to commit until after the November Election.. I believe the administration would welcome the controversy to help get his people motivated to vote this cycle..

We are where we are because "Conservatives" have continued the failed "tactics" of appeasing and trying to not "upset" the Left.

The Left will find a way to make up "controversies" no matter what the Right does.

9 posted on 07/01/2012 6:04:06 AM PDT by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: carlo3b

This lifeline thrown out by SC my be the death knell of the ABA. It is not the extra 10% that the Feds might have to pay for covering the working poor or preexisting conditions, but that forcing these folks upon private carriers will put insurance prices through the roof. No expanded Medicaid screws their numbers really bad.


10 posted on 07/01/2012 6:57:01 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (Democrats are the problem. Vote them out, all of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: carlo3b

FYI — The editorial section of the Boston Sunday Globe was remarkably void of any commentary about the Supreme Court decision on Obummercare. Silence.

Much of the country is howling about Justice Roberts’ strange call, but not the Globe, which often reflects the prevailing opinion in the Progressive corner.

How very interesting.


13 posted on 07/01/2012 7:53:22 AM PDT by DNME (Prepare ... quickly. Time grows short.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: carlo3b
Change "marijuana prohibition" to "Obamacare" and we have a winner...

"Just as the process of repealing national alcohol prohibition began with individual states repealing their own prohibition laws, so individual states must now take the initiative with respect to repealing marijuana prohibition laws."

-George Soros

http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/g/george_soros.html

14 posted on 07/01/2012 7:57:23 AM PDT by P.O.E. (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: carlo3b
I had to go back to the Ginsberg dissent and it is still not there. Roberts' four buddies specifically set out in the dissent that their concurring opinion on the pernalytax issue that let Obmacare stand DID not concur as to the states opting out. They specifically state in their dissent that once the Obamacare passed muster, the Feds can do as they want - including withholding monies from states to force compliance.

This opt out “finding” being reported is bogus.

The republican Governors are just making sound good noises. The state provisions do not have to be implemented until 2014. They are banking on a new regime before then as well as banking on this “new” regime not doing the same thing as Obamba.

16 posted on 07/01/2012 12:46:05 PM PDT by lag along
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson