[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

I am still meditating on the "Happening"

I wanted it all killed!

But taking away the commerce clause has some merit.

And if it helps defeat Obama...then that should help.

[Ken H]

But taking away the commerce clause has some merit.

But we're still stuck with the Raich precedent, about which Thomas concluded in his dissent - "the Federal Government is no longer one of limited and enumerated powers." At best, the so-called Commerce Clause 'victory' means that the line was not expanded beyond Raich. Everything in Obamacare - except the mandate - is allowed under current Commerce Clause case law. It's about the hollowest victory I can imagine.

[sand88]

But taking away the commerce clause has some merit.

The Commerce Clause was not touched at all. Mark Levin clearly explained in great detail why the Commerce Clause was not effected in any way.

That is an outright lie being spread by elitist fake Conservatives like Charles K and others.