Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lookout88; StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; ...
Obama wanted to make a statement. He made the Chief justice rule in his favor. There is something very wrong with this.

I agree. I've listened to pundits and lawyers today on TV, radio, and read some of their opinions online.

I'm still appalled at how Roberts ruled, and I'm not sure I'll ever understand it. Seems to me Roberts is more concerned about "the integrity of the court" and with his "legacy" than about the United States of America.

12 posted on 06/28/2012 4:46:51 PM PDT by nutmeg (I'm with Sarah Palin: Anybody But Obama 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: nutmeg

It is simpler than that nutmeg. Given Arizona and Obamacare it is evident that Roberts is a lawless megalomaniac. He rewrote the statute to fit into the Constitution. Separation of powers? Yuck, yuck. Tax bills originating in the house? How silly, they originate at SCOTUS. Sovereign states? Not in Robert’s Rules of America. This is just another Harvard liberal backstabbing bastard.


15 posted on 06/28/2012 4:55:14 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: nutmeg

CJ Felcher has a special seat waiting for him in Hell.


19 posted on 06/28/2012 6:15:38 PM PDT by GOPsterinMA (The Glove don't fit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson