I'm not doing that. I'm voting for a real alternative.
No, I don't expect my vote to swing the election this year. But if the constitution party can swing from 0.5% of the vote to maybe 4% of the vote during this election, then maybe next time either the big parties will start paying attention to how many votes they aren't getting or the constitution party will continue to grow until they pass the GOP.
You use your brain! You can vote for more of the same by voting for one of the two main party candidates that are both controlled by liberals. Or you can vote for a real alternative.
If Obama gets elected, Congress is already standing up to him. If Romney gets elected a Republican party is going to vote liberal policies in under his leadership.
I'd rather have stalemate and endless investigations under Obama, than move "FORWARD" towards socialism under Romney.
“I’m voting for a real alternative.”
Virgil Goode is a former democRat who used to take orders from Nancy Pelosi in the house. ]
He’s a stealth pro-obama candidate and you’re getting played big time. Wake up before it’s too late.
What makes you think there will be a "next time" if we elect Obama again? Please explain how we won't collapse when Obama gets to elect maybe 2 Supreme Court Judges? Please explain this to me.
I am no fan of Romney, but he will get getting my vote and full support this Nov. If elected I will be critical of him and hold his feet to the fire.
Here’s your sign........)
Danny,
I don’t like Romney any more than you do. However, let’s look at a couple of facts:
1) Romney will be the Republican nominee;
2) The next President will either have a “D” or an “R” after his name - its been that way since the 1850’s, and if even a former President (Theodore Roosevelt) couldn’t win running under the banner of a third party, then no one can;
3) A re-elected Obama will have no accountability whatsoever, whereas a freshly-elected Romney will have to face re-election in 2016;
4) A re-elected Obama will already have his people in place and will already have laid the groundwork for truly monumental changes to the way this country operates, whereas Romney will take a while to get going (even pre-supposing that he’s as bad, which I don’t buy into);
5) Obama will utterly destroy free enterprise and the economy, and pose incredible risks regarding our foreign and defense policies (areas not to be ignored, despite the importance of the economy and our civil liberties), whereas Romney will likely grow the economy by getting government substantially out of the way and won’t be a pushover on foreign and defense policies.
In short, while Romney has his MANY negatives, there are numerous ways that a 2nd Obama term would be far worse than a first Romney term. Sometimes you have to swallow your pride and vote for the guy/gal you don’t like to stop someone worse. I learned my lesson about that in 1992, when I voted for Clinton (thinking him to be a sure one-termer) because I was ticked off at Bush 41 - that worked out well, didn’t it?
Please rethink your position - Romney will likely not be as bad as you think, and will CERTAINLY not be as bad as Obama’s 2nd term. FYI, I don’t really buy the “make it really hurt and then people will wake up” argument, because it has yet to happen in our history. Evil must be stopped ASAP, even if it is by someone far less than perfect.
I'd rather have stalemate and endless investigations under Obama, than move "FORWARD" towards socialism under Romney.
Well said, Danny. Art of War 101.