Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: newnhdad
I guess sitting at home is not an option then.

I see this straw man argument posted here many times recently.

One CAN be a conservative and NOT in good conscience vote for Romney -it is possible. REGARDLESS, even if one holds their nose and does vote for the RINO scumbag Romney, one does not have to agree with any of Romney's limp wristed leftist views.

You want Romney and his limp wrist agenda -fine. There is a difference between supporting a lesser evil candidate and embracing the evils of defeat -one does NOT stay at home to do that.

What good is winning an election when the elector is the enemy of your principles?

Staying at home and not voting for RINO or not staying at home and voting for RINO -misses the point completely as to THIS and many other principled topics.

We do NOT elect a king.

45 posted on 06/22/2012 7:19:27 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: DBeers

As we all know, name calling always works, RINO, scumbag, enemy, evil, limp-wristed.. yea, okay..
You speak like a socialist democrat that just lost the logical argument and has nothing left except feelings and rage. Since you object to the Republican candidate both losing and winning, there is nothing left to say.

Your name-calling won’t change my mind and the minds of many other Americans that can see the forest past the trees.

You can utilize all the pretzel logic you want to justify your own feelings and I respect principled opposition, but my point still stands.


46 posted on 06/22/2012 7:46:18 PM PDT by newnhdad (Where will you be during the Election Riots of 2012/2013?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson