[SoConPubbie]

Why would he?

Romney is already on record that he will not re-instate DADT and he the Father of Gay Marriage in America since he implemented it unconstitutionally in MA.

He has been Pro-Gay Rights his whole career and this is one policy position he continues to publicly support.

[cripplecreek]

I’m not hearing much about how we’re going to push Mittens to the right these days.

[Oldexpat]

So I guess we will have the Marine Corp band marching in the DC Gay Pride Parade..maybe with chaps and bare cheeks?
Plus a transgender Corps Commander at West Point? Where do they draw the line now that they have opened the gates?

[Jumper]

Romney is the candidate, and throgh pressure from Grassroots/nuts and the GOP his policies can be swayed or directed differently from when he was governor of MA. Just as any president signs legistation put before him by the elected bodies (congress/senate), or makes a decision.

Two thoughts on this matter, 1) that with Romney's record on Gay rights issues, this splinters the democrat voting block; 2) the Generals have no business doing anything other than what they are told by elected officials for they are not political people but career soldiers (I am retired Army).

While I agree with preventing gays from openly serving my opposition is based on the fact that accepting Gays makes acceptance of their sexual habits okay, and if gay sex is okay then hetrosexuals will have to defend themselves from charges of consentual sex if forced/black (maled/femaled) into a gay relationship, and further any flurting by gays can actually be more than unwanted but rather an intimidation factor since Gays have achieved protected status.

Maybe having Sandusky charged in the month of Gay Celebration will dampen the current sport for gay lifestyls? His son will certainly hope so.

[KantianBurke]

Mega bump to your comments & I love your tagline!