Here is jdirt’s post from this thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2896532/posts
The Judge clearly asked the plaintiff’s attorney, Mr. Klayman, that if I grant you leave to amend your complaint, will you be providing something that shows Obama was not born in the US?
And Klayman said YES.
And Klayman said YES.
Yes he did. Maybe twice.
That takes on special significance given that Arpaio and Zullo both submitted affidavits for this case. I’m wondering if they waited with this, to include it in an amendment to the complaint, because it’s something that surfaced through Zullo’s visit to Hawaii.
When will we know what the evidence will be that Klayman claims he has? If he has evidence that BHO was born outside the USofA, why didn’t he present it to the court?