To: Berlin_Freeper; Hotlanta Mike; Silentgypsy; repubmom; HANG THE EXPENSE; Nepeta; Bikkuri; Plummz; ...
2 posted on
06/18/2012 8:19:23 AM PDT by
Brown Deer
(Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
To: Brown Deer
Empty courtroom.
Are they at lunch or in recess??
To: Brown Deer
Well I was just late for the show I guess.
How about this then...@Obama attorneys argue he's not Dem nominee
Attorneys representing Obama argued that the Florida presidential preference primary, on which Obamas name was the only Democrat nominee, does not make Obama the Democratic nominee for president yet. My what a tangled web.
8 posted on
06/18/2012 8:44:51 AM PDT by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: Brown Deer
The argument from the FL Sec. of State about Hillary winning the 2008 primary, but not ultimately being the Democratic nominee for Pres., kind of makes sense to me.
To: Brown Deer
If the argument is followed to its logical extreme, it seems, then parties should be allowed to nominate Mickey and Minnie Mouse for President and Vice President.
16 posted on
06/18/2012 9:25:39 AM PDT by
SteveH
(First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.)
To:
Smoke Gets In Your Eyes
Sing-A-Long
|
17 posted on
06/18/2012 9:37:39 AM PDT by
devolve
(------ ---- ---------toss_subhumans_in_Hannibal*s_wild_boar_pit----------- ---------------------)
To: Brown Deer
Obama attorneys argue he’s not Dem nominee
http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/obama-attorneys-argue-hes-not-dem-nominee/
SNIP
The arguments by Obamas attorneys reflected their desire to have the judge simply dismiss the case because they claim a sitting president chosen by his party at multiple levels is not yet or officially the nominee.
Klayman accused them of running a shell game and simply trying to put off the issue, as numerous court cases did during the 2008 election, until the election was over and Obama was inaugurated.
The judge called the hearing on the issue of Obamas eligibility because as part of the challenge, Klayman cited a definition of natural born citizen, which the Constitution requires of presidents, from the U.S. Supreme Court. Obamas attorneys, however, simply said that didnt apply but offered no further citations.
To: Brown Deer
There is no way this judge rules against zero. He looked scared just talking about it.
This is going no where.
This guy doesn’t want to get a Breitbart Dart.
29 posted on
06/18/2012 10:23:17 AM PDT by
AdamBomb
To: Brown Deer
38 posted on
06/18/2012 10:46:46 AM PDT by
cpdiii
(Deckhand, Roughneck, Mud Man, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist. THE CONSTITUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR!)
To: Brown Deer
Did this judge not hear that when people became democrats and the democrat rule says that Obama is automatically the candidate, then the people voted. They voted by giving their rights and their vote to decide their candidate under these circumstances to the democrat party.
114 posted on
06/19/2012 1:59:13 AM PDT by
Bellflower
(The LORD is Holy, separated from all sin, perfect, righteous, high and lifted up.)
To: Brown Deer
Not to be rude, but why is that fellows face so strangely red, but not around his eyes and parts of his mouth? Did he stay out in the sun too long or does he have a birthmark of sorts?
Also, I think the judge ask some pretty asinine questions, such as the one about what if the citizen father died before a baby is born. He doesn't ask totally inane questions like this one to the other side. His attitude is soft and conciliatory to the President's attorneys but strained with ours. And he does seem scared or in the least quite nervous.
115 posted on
06/19/2012 2:14:35 AM PDT by
Bellflower
(The LORD is Holy, separated from all sin, perfect, righteous, high and lifted up.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson