To: Justaham
"The prosecution was short on proof that Edwards knew about the payments or that he knew that accepting them was illegal. "As noted by nearly every campaign finance lawyer who considered the matter, this was a lousy case,"He may be amazingly slimy, even for a tort lawyer and a politician, but that's not against the law, AFAIK.
10 posted on
06/13/2012 2:19:18 PM PDT by
Sooth2222
("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
To: Sooth2222
“The prosecution was short on proof that Edwards knew about the payments or that he knew that accepting them was illegal. “
So he claimed them as a personal gift on his taxes?
29 posted on
06/13/2012 7:22:42 PM PDT by
freedomfiter2
(Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson