The "new" law is a repeat. The same law had been passed
before the Indiana supreme Court ruled that there was no right to resist unlawful force by a police officer, period. The Indiana Supreme Court held that (there is no right to use force against unlawful force) and did not even mention the law that was on the books. It was a big enough deal that the Indiana Supreme Court reheard the same case, a second time, and repeated its ruling over a single dissent.
The Indiana legislature picked up the challenge, and passed the law again.
The "new" law is a repeat. The same law had been passed before the Indiana supreme Court ruled that there was no right to resist unlawful force by a police officer, period. The Indiana Supreme Court held that (there is no right to use force against unlawful force) and did not even mention the law that was on the books. It was a big enough deal that the Indiana Supreme Court reheard the same case, a second time, and repeated its ruling over a single dissent. Wow, that's interesting; where'd you find it out?
The Indiana legislature picked up the challenge, and passed the law again.
I think the should also impeach the judges... and request the Feds charge them with Conspiracy Against Rights.
The wonton disregard of the law, and the State Constitution, by the IN supreme court is inexcusable.