To: carriage_hill
Still don't see the resemblance to "Hugs not Bullets." But then, I'm not clear on who the latter program proposes to "hug," nor on how.
23 posted on
06/11/2012 10:31:12 AM PDT by
JustSayNoToNannies
(A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
To: JustSayNoToNannies
“Hugs” for the murderous narco-terrorists? Instead of them using “bullets”? Yeah, that’ll work real well, if that’s the purpose. Not. If it’s for the many innocent people getting murdered, that’s not going to work well, either. Minor “details” of the program which are not clearly spelled-out.
25 posted on
06/11/2012 11:22:18 AM PDT by
Carriage Hill
(All libs & most dems think that life is just a sponge bath, with a happy ending.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson