Four more years of Obama would be a disaster America may never recover from.
There's only one person with a realistic chance of denying Barack Obama four more years and that, for better or worse, is Mitt Romney. Any rational conservative has no choice but to hope he wins.
“For the good of the economy, the good of our defense and to keep more whacked-out liberals from holding lifetime appointments on the bench, we need Romney no matter how much we disagree with his social and religious views.
Four more years of Obama would be a disaster America may never recover from.
There’s only one person with a realistic chance of denying Barack Obama four more years and that, for better or worse, is Mitt Romney. Any rational conservative has no choice but to hope he wins.”
Well said! I would add that we better do more than “hope” — at the very least we all need to get out and VOTE for Romney, as the only way to deny Obama a second term.
Hugh Hewitt, a great Right Radio talk show host, had me sold on Romney back in '06 or '07. Then I started looking at Romney's record, listening to his speeches, and reading his op-eds.
Your argument would make sense if it didn't entail installing a whacked-out liberal Republican with a confirmed, documented, solid, in-office record of advancing the liberal agenda on five fronts, including judicial appointments.
To me, any rational conservative understands that this isn't about Obama vs Romney, it's about authoritarian statism vs limited government conservatism. The only way to advance limited government conservatism is to weaken the authoritarian statist president. To me, any rational conservative will vote to do that.
Did I see right? Rational conservative? On this thread? LOL