Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Innovative

I am tired of tiptoing here.

Romney might be to the left of McCain. But he is still to the right of the commie obozo.

And Romney’s last few months of speeches suggest he actually hears us Tea Partiers (something McCain never did).

VOTE OBOZO OUT! HOLD YOUR FREAKING NOSES AGAIN AND LET’S SET THE TABLE FOR THE NEW GENERATION OF REAL CONSERVATIVES!!!!


2 posted on 06/09/2012 8:21:17 AM PDT by freedumb2003 ('RETRO' Abortions = performed on 84th trimester individuals who think killing babies is a "right.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: freedumb2003

I wono’t have to hold my nose anywhere near as hard to vote for Romney as I did to vote for John the freakin “maverick(TM)” McCain..... Santorum has it dead to rights here, all we’re talking about at this point is getting the US government back under adult supervision.


15 posted on 06/09/2012 9:19:44 AM PDT by varmintman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: freedumb2003

” And Romney’s last few months of speeches suggest he actually hears us Tea Partiers (something McCain never did).”

You mean like when he chose an Obamacare advocate to lead his transition team?


23 posted on 06/09/2012 10:32:21 AM PDT by vmivol00 (I won't be reconstructed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: freedumb2003

” And Romney’s last few months of speeches suggest he actually hears us Tea Partiers (something McCain never did).”

You mean like when he chose an Obamacare advocate to lead his transition team?


24 posted on 06/09/2012 10:32:30 AM PDT by vmivol00 (I won't be reconstructed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: freedumb2003

” And Romney’s last few months of speeches suggest he actually hears us Tea Partiers (something McCain never did).”

You mean like when he chose an Obamacare advocate to lead his transition team?


26 posted on 06/09/2012 10:32:56 AM PDT by vmivol00 (I won't be reconstructed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: freedumb2003

” And Romney’s last few months of speeches suggest he actually hears us Tea Partiers (something McCain never did).”

You mean like when he chose an Obamacare advocate to lead his transition team?


27 posted on 06/09/2012 10:32:56 AM PDT by vmivol00 (I won't be reconstructed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: freedumb2003

” And Romney’s last few months of speeches suggest he actually hears us Tea Partiers (something McCain never did).”

You mean like when he chose an Obamacare advocate to lead his transition team?


28 posted on 06/09/2012 10:32:56 AM PDT by vmivol00 (I won't be reconstructed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: freedumb2003

” And Romney’s last few months of speeches suggest he actually hears us Tea Partiers (something McCain never did).”

You mean like when he chose an Obamacare advocate to lead his transition team?


29 posted on 06/09/2012 10:33:13 AM PDT by vmivol00 (I won't be reconstructed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: freedumb2003

” And Romney’s last few months of speeches suggest he actually hears us Tea Partiers (something McCain never did).”

You mean like when he chose an Obamacare advocate to lead his transition team?


30 posted on 06/09/2012 10:33:13 AM PDT by vmivol00 (I won't be reconstructed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: freedumb2003

Sorry about the multiple posts. My phone glitched on me.


32 posted on 06/09/2012 11:01:13 AM PDT by vmivol00 (I won't be reconstructed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: freedumb2003; Mountain Mary
I'm not so sure with this line of reasoning.

Oh I understand the logic of it. To defeat Obama, the only way now is hold your nose and vote Romney - and that is obviously true. But surely, the enemy is not Obama per se, but socialism/liberalism generally, and by voting Mitt, are we not ultimately empowering that?

Let me put my reasoning to you. What I mean is that another term of Obama is going to mean great chunks bitten out of what is left of America, but a term or two of Mitt Romney is not going to restore anything. It will mean nibbling at what is left of America rather than biting at it. The "progressives" win either way.

And once again, how is a Mitt Romney presidency going to mean "a new generation of true conservative candidates" in four to eight years time? The GOP does not field candidates on their principles. They field candidates that the most number of people will put up with. If true conservative voters do turn out for Romney in significant numbers, it sends a clear and unequivocal message that RINO's can safely be on the ticket for the rest of time.

Finally, there is a strategic issue here. The economy is tanking, unemployment remains high, America's reputation overseas is at an all time low, inflation is beginning to rise, corruption and graft is endemic and the levels of debt are at staggering levels - possibly irretrievable levels. Of course, as conservatives we know exactly why - socialism as a system just simply does not work, and every passing day makes that more and more obvious to all but the most dedicated or mentally challenged statist. In other words, this might be a "good" election to lose. It would be horrid if a Republican got in just in time to take all the blame for Obama's folly, thus ruining the chances of the next guy four years down the line.

62 posted on 06/10/2012 3:12:04 PM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson