So, 8 to 1 spending ratio is unfair...let me see.
If people donate 8 dollars for every one that the opposition receives, isn’t that a form of support? What they are saying is that it is unfair to support your candidate with your money? How can this be an unfair result when the donations are voluntary?
It is more fair than the unions charging confiscatory rates for union dues without allowing people to decline to pay...
Besides, are they saying that all the “would be” voters were in fact swayed by television ads? DO they think their target audience of potential supporters is so easily swayed? They certainly do not have a high opinion of their supporters, do they?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2892649/posts
“Spending Gap? Media Ignores $21 Million Unions Spent in WI”