Obama's Kentucky primary performance means party could need plan B for delegate selection

cn|2 Pure Politics ^ | May 24, 2012 | Nick Storm

[Republican Wildcat]

President Barack Obama’s 58 percent share of the vote against the “uncommitted” option on Tuesday not only caused some national headlines but also some headaches for Kentucky Democrats — specifically when it comes to selecting national delegates.

Party officials are in the planning process of the statewide organizational convention on June 2 in which those participating with select Kentucky’s delegates to the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, N.C.

The uncommitted option received enough support to have representation in Kentucky’s delegation to the national convention, and that’s what’s causing the biggest headache for Democratic Party officials who are trying to work out how to elect delegates to the national convention that technically reflect being uncommitted. The deadline to apply to be a delegate was May 4.

Article IIIV of the party’s bylaws suggest that the party’s Central Executive Committee could be called on to decide how the delegates should be selected if there aren’t enough who applied as “uncommitted.”

The State Central Committee shall have in addition to the other powers herein conferred upon it, the authority to promulgate, alter, or amend the method and procedure for the selection of delegates to the Democratic National Convention, provided that such promulgation, alteration or amendment shall conform to the applicable rules and regulations of the National Democratic Party.

But Kentucky Democratic Spokesman Matt Erwin told Pure Politics on Thursday that no matter what, the party will be sending loyal Democrats who ultimately will support President Obama to the convention.

Erwin noted that Obama still received 1,700 more total votes than likely Republican nominee Mitt Romney did in Kentucky’s GOP primary. But as former Secretary of State Trey Grayson said on Pure Politics that is largely meaningless heading into the fall because the electorate will be different and much larger. For that reason, Grayson said Obama’s performance in the Democratic primary only reinforces that Obama will likely lose Kentucky but reveals nothing about the margin.

Erwin said he attributed the results for President Obama to Kentucky Democrats’ “independence.”

Obama's Kentucky primary performance means party could need plan B for delegate selection (complete article with video)

[sportutegrl]

How to find a delegate to represent Nobody? Find a Democrat with an “Anybody but Obama” bumpersticker.

[Recon Dad]

Grayson said Obama’s performance in the Democratic primary only reinforces that Obama will likely lose Kentucky

.....wow Nellie, there's a brilliant political observation.

[TexasNative2000]

Why are they worried about what the rules say? These are Democrats we’re talking about.

[Republican Wildcat]

You removed that comment from its context. That was in response to the spin on the vote that Obama "got more votes than Romney" as though his vote result was a positive.

Erwin noted that Obama still received 1,700 more total votes than likely Republican nominee Mitt Romney did in Kentucky’s GOP primary. But as former Secretary of State Trey Grayson said on Pure Politics that is largely meaningless heading into the fall because the electorate will be different and much larger. For that reason, Grayson said Obama’s performance in the Democratic primary only reinforces that Obama will likely lose Kentucky but reveals nothing about the margin.

[Recon Dad]

My point was any chance of Zero winning in Kentucky was nil.

[Republican Wildcat]

I guess I misunderstood...it looked like you were making it out like he just volunteered a “Captain Obvious” statement rather than responding to the Dem spokesman’s comment.