I must be slipping. I only have used and/or own seven of these rifles, not counting duplicates.
Perhaps we should start another thread for military origin rifles. The Remington 700 is used by our military, and the AR group of rifles is increasingly favored by today's hunters.
1 posted on
06/04/2012 4:54:34 AM PDT by
marktwain
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: marktwain
An Armalite AR-10, an FN-FAL, an HK-91, or an M-1A...IMO ;)
2 posted on
06/04/2012 4:58:22 AM PDT by
RC one
(this space intentionally left blank)
To: marktwain
Ditto on the Savage 99. Mine is in .250 and I have had great success with it.
3 posted on
06/04/2012 5:06:46 AM PDT by
Texas Colonel
(Get as close as you can...then get 10 yards closer..)
To: marktwain
Ditto on the Savage 99. Mine is in .250 and I have had great success with it.
4 posted on
06/04/2012 5:06:46 AM PDT by
Texas Colonel
(Get as close as you can...then get 10 yards closer..)
To: marktwain
I am partial to the Ruger M77 all stainless .338 but with a rubber coated Hogue fiberglass stock. Thats my moose rifle, its technically a deer rifle, moose are in the deer family.
5 posted on
06/04/2012 5:11:31 AM PDT by
Eye of Unk
(Liberals need not reply.)
To: marktwain
WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT??
NO muzzleloaders????
We’ve been around A LOT LONGER than those cartridge thingys.
6 posted on
06/04/2012 5:14:08 AM PDT by
Flintlock
(THE TRUTH: It's the new hate speech..)
To: marktwain
Firearms were created for the purpose of combat. To exclude “military origin” rifles would be to exclude every rifle on this list.
7 posted on
06/04/2012 5:21:45 AM PDT by
Durus
(You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
To: marktwain
Got my first deer, a couple of decades ago, with a Model 94 30-30. Loved that rifle. Wish I still had it.
8 posted on
06/04/2012 5:23:26 AM PDT by
WKUHilltopper
(And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
To: marktwain; harpseal; TexasCowboy; nunya bidness; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; wku man; SLB; ...
I have to agree with RC One -- the FAL and M1A work very well on the deer, the FAL especially. The M1A is a bit more accurate, but a lot heavier to lug around, especially in hilly terrain.
I also must point out that the Marlin 1894 in .44mag works as well as the Model 94 out to a few hunded yards. After that, the .30-30 shoots much flatter. With the density of the woods in my area, 150 is all you'll need; often less than that.
10 posted on
06/04/2012 5:26:14 AM PDT by
Joe Brower
(Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
To: marktwain
If you are making sausage, an M249 isn’t a bad choice.
14 posted on
06/04/2012 5:49:51 AM PDT by
USMCPOP
(Father of LCpl. Karl Linn, KIA 1/26/2005 Al Haqlaniyah, Iraq)
To: marktwain
Growing up in Western PA, I can’t disagree with any of the author’s selections, but I would say there were a small band of .25 calliber diehards for the general PA utility rifle. The .250 Savage, .257 Roberts, .25-06 and .257 Weatherby could be loaded with lighter bullets for reaching out and touching those groundhogs at long range, and loaded heavy for PA black bear and manage everything in between. If you could have only one rifle in PA, it’s the ticket.
15 posted on
06/04/2012 5:50:46 AM PDT by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: marktwain
My dad and I took a lot of game with a Remington 760 in .270. Hand-loads ... Chasing game ... It made for some of the best bonding I ever had with him.
16 posted on
06/04/2012 5:50:54 AM PDT by
IronJack
(=)
To: marktwain
I have the 35 Remington lever action which is great for hunting in the woods. My favorite deer rifles are the 270 Browning Bar and 257 Weatherby Magnum. The last deer I shot with the 270 dropped like a house fell on its head.
17 posted on
06/04/2012 5:54:35 AM PDT by
peeps36
(America is being destroyed by filthy traitors in the political establishment)
To: marktwain
The drawback with the Model 94 is getting the second shot. The rifle recoils up and you lose you target. The Winchester Model 70 recoils straight back allowing a second shot. IMHO
To: marktwain
Nothing like a top 10 gun thread to get the whole room yakking.
22 posted on
06/04/2012 7:11:54 AM PDT by
lurk
To: marktwain
The important characteristic is the ability to penetrate blue helmets.
23 posted on
06/04/2012 7:38:04 AM PDT by
JimRed
(Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
To: marktwain
Interesting choices for sure. But if we’re not talking about just mass-produced rifles, we should add sporters based on military rifles. The Swedish Mauser in 6.5 x 55 is supposed to be an excellent, low recoil, high-penetrating and accurate deer/elk slayer. I personnaly have a customized FN-built Yugo Mauser action mated to a step-down 308 barrel and sporter stock, custom safety and bolt job—just a sweet rifle with an interesting history.
24 posted on
06/04/2012 7:56:32 AM PDT by
mikeus_maximus
(I won't vote for Romney, period. Voting for "the lesser of two evils" is still voting for evil.)
To: marktwain
Silly article.
It’s 99% hunter, and 1% rifle (assuming any of the wide range of appropriate cartridges). The rifles are all fine.
25 posted on
06/04/2012 8:13:31 AM PDT by
Atlas Sneezed
(Hold My Beer and Watch This!)
To: marktwain
Silly article.
It’s 99% hunter, and 1% rifle (assuming any of the wide range of appropriate cartridges). The rifles are all fine.
26 posted on
06/04/2012 8:21:46 AM PDT by
Atlas Sneezed
(Hold My Beer and Watch This!)
To: marktwain
27 posted on
06/04/2012 9:01:04 AM PDT by
New Jersey Realist
(America: home of the free because of the brave)
To: marktwain
Thread is nearly useless without gun ‘pron’.
34 posted on
06/04/2012 11:08:26 AM PDT by
MHGinTN
(Being deceived can be cured.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson