The problem with these studies is that they don’t take into account the stories the media doesn’t even report on because it would be bad for Obama. The Catholic lawsuit against Obama sprints to mind.
Bingo. The truth is that IF the media reported ALL of the negative things about OBAMA, it would be 90% negative Obama 10% negative whoever. You can’t prove anything with these studies, because these studies don’t acknowledge the obvious. BTW, if anyone still (as of June 2012) supports Obama, they are either (a) stupid (b) biased (c) ignorant or (d) a bad person. I can’t imagine any situation under any circumstances where someone would qualify as a-d
You are correct in the willful ommission.
The MSM will report say, a weak jobs report, but they NEVER tie it to Obama or the Dems.
Bush was blamed for Katrina for God’s sake...they never connect Obama with anything with the border, economy, Middle East, etc.
That all “just happens” Obama is never cited as a purveying cause, directly or indirectly.