Replies

I'll leave aside the Sarah issue, since good, honest people have come down on both sides of that one. But the idea that the week of Aug 4, 1961 being missing from the National Archives is ‘just coincidence’ is not credible. Of all the wks to go missing, just that one disappears, and it's nothing more than incompetence?

It is arguments like this that tip the hand of the Obots. They take all the weird, hinky anomalies in Obama’s records and in ea and every case assign a benign explanation. ‘Oh, the date stamp merely malfunctioned the day Obama registered for the Draft’ etc. etc. etc. etc. Never mind that the odds of all these shady anomalies happening to the same poor, benighted hapless guy are incalculable; to the Kool Aid drinking moonbats anything is possible/nothing raises an eyebrow.

Now I know for a certain fact that you are antipodal to the moonbat Obots. That is why your reply surprises me. For you to echo their explanation is the last thing I expected. Coincidental incompetence? Really? That poor man, Obama, has to be the most unfortunate human on earth when it comes to vital records. Something sketchy appears on every one he reveals, and it only illustrates how concentratedly inept any official associated w Obama’s documents was.

Needless to say, I don't buy it. That missing wk is evidence of more than coincidental incompetence. Who exactly arrived in HI from which foreign country I obviously do not know—the documentation is missing, duh. But someone arrived that week, someone whose arrival seriously/fundamentally undercuts BO’s nativity fairytale. That much would seem obvious at a minimum to all but the most hardcore moonbat Kool Aid drinkers...unless there truly is a benign and *likely* explanation. If there is, I haven't seen it yet.

But the idea that the week of Aug 4, 1961 being missing from the National Archives is ‘just coincidence’ is not credible. Of all the wks to go missing, just that one disappears, and it's nothing more than incompetence?

I'm not saying that it is, i'm saying that it might be. I think it looks suspicious as well, and I would very much like to hear an explanation for it, but it ought not be stretched into proof he was born in Kenya. ( I favor Canada, myself.)

Never mind that the odds of all these shady anomalies happening to the same poor, benighted hapless guy are incalculable; to the Kool Aid drinking moonbats anything is possible/nothing raises an eyebrow.

But what about when weird long shot pieces of information turn out to be beneficial to our side? What are the odds that a President's mother would have posed nude, and that photographs would eventually come out? THAT is a wild long shot. THAT is a case where an anomaly just happened to go our way. Weird long shots *do* happen sometimes.

I don't think it's a coincidence, or the result of incompetence, but that explanation cannot be dismissed just yet. I don't know about you, but I am juggling half a dozen possible theories at the same time. I see more and better evidence for some theories than I do for others, but I don't rule any of them out until they just won't square with some piece of provable data. The inability to acquire travel records for that particular period of time (while being able to see all other time periods) is a very suspicious circumstance. Hopefully the Zullo team will be able to enlighten us with the information they appear to have recently uncovered, and if it turns out they can prove or provide better links to Kenya, i'll be thrilled. It just currently looks like a dark horse from my perspective.

We only have to wait a couple of weeks, and then the Cold case posse will have their press conference. I can live with the possibility that I might be wrong till then.