The "scientific response" has exactly zero to do with the quality of science IN the paper. Your constant assertions to the contrary are simply your continuing intellectual dishonesty. The paper is there. The methodology and results are there. Show me the errors in them. Or post a link to a paper that has refuted/falsified that specific paper. Constantly ducking the issue simply proves again that you are a fraud.
Sure it does. 19 years have passed. The article hasn't been influential nor has it led to a useful device.
The burden of proof is on the one making the claim and promoting the disreputable science.