[Wonder Warthog]

"That's only works for people who are impressed by your gullibility. I'm not. Where has the article been cited over the past 19 years?"

Still trying to sell the idea that citation (or lack of same) actually means something. It doesn't. Address the science in the paper. Show me the errors. Your shuckin' and jivin' is getting old.

I have yet to see a single skeptopath actually reference the journal articles that supposedly disprove LENR. Not even once.

[Moonman62]

Still trying to sell the idea that citation (or lack of same) actually means something. It doesn't.

Actually it does. Other scientists who have lab equipment and who are paid to do such things have either refuted the article or ignored it, going by your non-response. Either, way, that indicates it's junk.

I see no reason why someone on a conservative politics forum should have to do the work that scientists have had 19 years to do.

Address the science in the paper.

Will you ever address the scientific response to the paper? You're the one promoting a disreputable science. The burden of proof is on you.