Yup, and when the history of CF is definitively written, you skeptopaths are going to have a lot to answer for. Not just for Pons/Fleischmann, but Bockris and many others, and outright fraud (MIT "failed replication").
"Because publishing articles and then having them cited by subsequent articles that either affirm the claims or refute them is how most science is done, not in blogs as is done with cold fusion."
Still lying. The article I cited did not originate in a blog. Science is discussed everywhere nowadays, including in blogs (but LENR/CANR is NOT a "blog", any more than FR is). And the stifling of publication in certain journals is another thing you skeptopaths are going to have to answer for (many, many cases documented, extending even to Nobel Prize physicists (Julian Schwinger)).
"Because I'm not the one making the extraordinary claim. I'm not the one pumping up a disreputable science filled with con artists like Rossi and scientists like George Miley making claims he can't back up.
The article is there. Address the science in the article. Stop dancing around the issue and bringing in more extraneous and irrelevant issues.
"Wow! A backhanded admission, after months of daily hype by you and Kevmo that Rossi was making things up.
Yes, Rossi uses misdirection quite heavily to lead potential competitors astray. There is stil NO evicence whatsoever that he has lied about the core of his discovery (generation of large amounts of heat energy).
You're really good a "shuckin' and jivin" around the core issue. You once told me to pick and article and "support it" (whatever that means). Well, there is the article, from a peer-reviewed journal, which definitively makes the science case for fusion in Pd/D2 systems. The work, IMO, was both thorough and carefully done. I see no errors of any significance.
Now PUT UP or SHUT UP.
LOL! "The Truth is Out There."
Still lying. The article I cited did not originate in a blog.
I didn't say otherwise.
Science is discussed everywhere nowadays, including in blogs (but LENR/CANR is NOT a "blog", any more than FR is).
The business of science is still done in journals. The quality of blog discussions is all over the place. LENR/CANR is a personal website hosted on Wordpress.
The work, IMO, was both thorough and carefully done. I see no errors of any significance.
That's only works for people who are impressed by your gullibility. I'm not. Where has the article been cited over the past 19 years?