[Wonder Warthog]

"Where’s the scientific validation of this article? Where has it been cited since 1993? And you still haven’t addressed the science. Your link to a personal website is your meager contribution."

The article originated in the Journal of Electroanalytical Chemisty, a well respected peer reviewed scientific journal. The fact that the particular copy I chose to link to happens to reside at LENR/CNAR is of zero relevance to the validity of the data contained in the article.

"The NASA memo was one in a million. I explained why it was believable. You can't automatically assume that every piece of junk you link to falls into the same category."

So, explain why this specific linked article is wrong. Where are the errors in the experiments detailed? Address the science in THIS article. Try honest debate just ONCE.

But you won't.

[Moonman62]

The article originated in the Journal of Electroanalytical Chemisty, a well respected peer reviewed scientific journal.

It isn't well respected. It's the same journal where Fleischmann and Pons went to ruin their careers.

And you still can't show where your paper has been cited since 1993.