[Talisker]

U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken there was no proof the DOMA provision was "rationally related to a legitimate government interest."

Hey Claudia, what proof is there that defining marriage ITSELF is "rationally related to a legitimate government interest"?

Other, that is, than a tax definition?

[noinfringers2]

I would offer that it is the judge who is not rational as to understanding rational history of humans and related societal structures. The judge is a good example of social tampering using the laws and power of appointed office(not necessarily by social knowledge) to further some idiosyncrasy.