Replies

... And also demand of him ( if they didn't confirm it, which I doubt they did )why he didn't demand the verification that he originally asked for - the BC number, date of registration, etc. After all, their initial denials were not on what he was asking for, but on why he was asking for it. Since they answered him, he must have satisfied the why, so why cave in on the what? Is that the REAL reason they were denying it and the AG of Hawaii told him over the phone if he changed what he was asking for ( giving him a hint ) then they would reply ?

Exactly. Seems like if he was qualified to get a verification then he was qualified to get verification of the specific things he asked for. Why would they insist that he change what he ask for?

The things he asked for were specifically geared towards verifying that it was a LEGALLY VALID birth record. So why would they balk at verifying that? Could it be because any “verification” they would do would totally rely on a birth index which has specifically been altered to include legally non-valid records?

We need to see what really transpired. If I knew how to request the records I’d request it myself.