Carefully read the Hawaii AG's response. Notice that he is telling Bennett, specifically, what legal language he must use to request confirmation of Obama's vital record(s).
But the key phrase, although not quoted, is "provide legal authority." Hawaii is essentially saying to Bennett, "Cite the AZ statute that requires you, as the SoS and head of elections, to confirm a candidate's vital record(s).
It took Hawaii EIGHT weeks to respond. Guess what that means? The Hawaii AG has researched AZ law and knows that there is no such statute. It's just a legal game.
Bennett is going to have to take it to the next level.
But there are laws against using faux ID and false documentation. Doesn’t have to be to verify to be put on ballot. Just that he will not put a person on ballot unless the ID proves not to be faked.
Very interesting this matter has been passed on to the Hawaii AG. The head of the DOH could have easily confirmed the matter for the SOS for AZ and this issue would be over long ago.
It’s possible the digital BC released to the public does not match what they have and Hawaii has gone in to self-protect mode. Why else would it have been passed off to the AG?