Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ETL
Yes, that was perhaps dumb of him, but she was on a cellphone. Her car drifted across the line and struck him. How is it not negligent homicide?

The cell phone should not be a factor until it becomes unlawful to use a cell phone while driving...

If the man was running with the traffic, he was on the wrong side of the road...Had he been of the right side of the road, she wouldn't have hit him...Plus, he may have been able to avoid a vehicle going over the line had he seen it coming...

It likely was not a sharp turn over the line but a gradual drift...

45 posted on 05/15/2012 6:07:09 AM PDT by Iscool (You mess with me, you mess with the WHOLE trailerpark...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Iscool
The cell phone should not be a factor until it becomes unlawful to use a cell phone while driving...

It's not illegal to snort Clorox while driving either...but would be very distracting also...and probably lead to an accident.

59 posted on 05/15/2012 7:05:50 AM PDT by moovova (OBAMA: The first US President to come out of the closet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: Iscool

“The cell phone should not be a factor until it becomes unlawful to use a cell phone while driving...”

It -is- unlawful to use a cell phone while driving in Connecticut, and has been so for a number of years.

It may be perfectly legal in the state from which you’re posting, but not so in CT...


70 posted on 05/15/2012 9:53:46 AM PDT by Road Glide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson