Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Final poll gives North Carolina marriage amendment clear advantage
Charlotte Observer ^ | John Frank

Posted on 05/07/2012 7:09:14 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican

A final poll of likely North Carolina voters conducted over the weekend continues to give a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage and civil unions an easy margin of victory in Tuesday’s election while the Democratic contest for governor is tightening.

The referendum holds a 16-point advantage, 55 percent in favor and 39 percent against, according to the Public Policy Polling survey, a left-leaning Raleigh-based firm. The numbers shifted little in the final week as big-names on either side of the debate – Rev. Billy Graham for and former President Bill Clinton against – made final pleas to persuade voters.

Many voters still don’t understand what the amendment would accomplish, pollster Tom Jensen said, noting that a majority of North Carolinians support some legal recognition for same-sex couples. “Opponents of the amendment had an uphill battle in convincing voters that it was anything other than a referendum on gay marriage, even though it does go a lot further than that” by forbidding civil unions and domestic partnerships, he said.

Jensen, whose firm worked for the anti-amendment campaign, believes the vote could get even more support, possibly as high as 59 percent. The vote brought a half-million people to the polls to vote early, exceeding even the huge jump in voting for the 2008 Democratic presidential primary between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

In the Democratic gubernatorial race, Lt. Gov. Walter Dalton’s 10-point lead from a week ago whittled down to a 5-point advantage in the final days. The polls showed Dalton getting about 34 percent of the vote and rival Bob Etheridge taking 29 percent. Four other candidates all received 4 percent or less.

(Excerpt) Read more at miamiherald.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; marriage; northcarolina

1 posted on 05/07/2012 7:09:18 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
The Rat Governor going down in flames plus homosexual “marriage” getting *crushed* statewide doesn't bode well for Osama Obama in November.W took NC in 2000 and all we have to do this year is take what W took then...nothing more,nothing less.
2 posted on 05/07/2012 7:16:20 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Julia: a casualty of the "War on Poverty")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Might it have been better to have this on the ballot in November instead of now? I’d have preferred passing this during the general election as a means of turning out more conservatives and Republicans to defeat Hussein.


3 posted on 05/07/2012 7:28:37 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
Might it have been better to have this on the ballot in November instead of now? I’d have preferred passing this during the general election as a means of turning out more conservatives and Republicans to defeat Hussein.

Having followed the progress of this amendment process for a while, I'll tell you that that was original plan, for a vote in the general election. Only, the Democrat sodomite supporters cried foul, knowing that the amendment would be a tidal wave of success with the votes against Obama (and FOR Obama, incidentally, since blacks vote for Obama and against counterfeit marriage.) And so, holding the ballot amendment initiative during the primaries was a concession to the Left due to the screeching protests of the liberal legislators.

Now, they're not happy with the current situation, either.

You can never please a Leftist. They are congenitally angry.

4 posted on 05/07/2012 7:40:28 PM PDT by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Thank you for that information. I had a feeling it probably played out along those lines.


5 posted on 05/07/2012 7:46:34 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

You could be right...it may well have been *better*.But it’s still pretty good,IMO.I’d be surprised if we didn’t take NC in Nov.


6 posted on 05/07/2012 7:59:10 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Julia: a casualty of the "War on Poverty")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
I may be wrong, but with the skyrocketing, violent militancy of activist homosexuals in the past few years, who here thinks that the amendment passage will bring out the diabolical worst in these anarchists, with vindictive assaults, property damage, harassment, lewd language/displays and other vile behavior?

I know it's North Carolina and not California, but homos are homos. At least NC is a 2nd Amendment honoring state.

7 posted on 05/07/2012 8:00:10 PM PDT by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
Some lib judge will say it's not constitutional and the peoples votes don't count just like in California. Men marrying men and women marrying women is just plain wrong. Give them legal rights but not marriage. That's just plain sick.
8 posted on 05/07/2012 9:04:45 PM PDT by dandiegirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

No worries. A leftist district court will declare it unconstitutional.


9 posted on 05/07/2012 9:19:07 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dandiegirl
In case you weren't keeping up, the California case is far from over. I don't get the surrender monkeys on this topic.

And homosexuals already HAVE all the legal rights that they're entitled to - no one is preventing them from entering into contracts binding on only the individuals involved. What ADDITIONAL "rights" do you think they should be given?

10 posted on 05/08/2012 5:59:18 AM PDT by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

The leftist aka progressive perverted homosexual are demanding what? Equality? They already have it.


11 posted on 05/08/2012 7:55:56 AM PDT by DMG2FUN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

They don’t want marriage. They want approval.

I’ve been smacking around my liberal/gay friends on Facebook. I’ll have to hide tomorrow because they are going to have grand mal hissy fit if this thing passes big. They’ll be threatening to leave the state, stop spending money, the whole bit.

I did tell them I would drop by to congratulate them on living in the “Hate State”.


12 posted on 05/08/2012 8:04:55 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you really want to annoy someone, point out something obvious that they are trying hard to ignore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson